• Site Map|
  • Directions|
  • Contact|
  • Home|
  • DSS Log In

  • Home
  • Library
  • FAQs
  • Resources
  • Attorney Profile
  • Contact Us

Practice Areas

  • Medical Malpractice
  • Car Accident
  • Defective Products
  • Slip and Fall/Premises Liability

Blog

Car Accident

  • Philadelphia Passes Hand Held Cell Phone Ban
  • Philadelphia Passes Hand Held Cell Phone Ban
  • 16 Injured in Philadelphia Bus Accident
  • Truck Owner Headed to Trial for Fatal Accident
  • UNDERINSURED VS. UNINSURED CLAIMS IN PENNSYLVANIA

view all

Latest News

  • Pennsylvania State Trooper Crack Down On I-81 Traffic Violations To Prevent Car Accidents...
    Posted on 12/3/2008
  • Norristown Teen Admits Hit-And-Run Involving Toddler In Montgomery County PA...
    Posted on 12/2/2008
  • Freak Truck And Car Accident Kills Woman on Route 22 in Lehigh County...
    Posted on 12/2/2008
  • Norristown, PA, Motorcycle and Hit and Run Leaves One Seriously Injured....
    Posted on 11/18/2008
  • Another West Mifflin Roadway Accident Raises Concern in Road’s Safety...
    Posted on 10/29/2008

view all

Library

Car Accident

  • UNDERINSURED AND UNINSURED CAR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
  • Pennsylvania Car Accident Safety Tips: Taking Precautions And Saving Lives
  • Seat Belt Safety Tips To Reduce Car Accident Injuries
  • What Steps Do You Take Directly After A Car Accident?

view all


Blog Category:

Car Accident

11/17/2008
Steve Reilly
Comments (0)

Punitive Damages Discovery

Federal District Judge James M. Munley in the case of Grosek v. Panther transportation, Inc. has ruled that discovery regarding the financial condition of a defendnat for a claim of punitive damages is permissible. 

In so holding the Judge noted, "it is inefficient to somehow delay discovery on the amount of punitive damages available until after a factual determination on the availabilty of such damages can be made." 

Judge Munley held that once plaintiffs had properly stated a claim for punitive damages "discovery on the amount of the damages is relevant."  Punitive damages are based on the concept that a defendant should be punished financially because of reckless or outrageous conduct.  This is a significant decision in that often times defendants will argue that discovery regarding their financial condition and ability to pay punitive damages is not allowed until there has been a finding that punitive damages should be awarded.

Labels: punitive damages, PA court decisions, Grosek v. Panther transportation, Pennsylvania court cases
Share This Page »
Tweet

There are no comments.

Post a comment

Post a Comment to "Punitive Damages Discovery"

To reply to this message, enter your reply in the box labeled "Message", hit "Post Message."

Username:*

Password:*

Register for an account

Message:

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

For security purposes, please enter the graphic text in the box below: [hit F5 if you can not read the text]

Quick Contact

Name *

Phone *

Email *

Tell us more *


Steven F. Reilly, PC
509 Swede Street
Norristown, PA 19401
Phone: (610) 272-7075
Fax: (610) 272-5729
Get Directions

Free Reports

5 Pennsylvania Malpractice Myths

FAQs

Car Accident

What are the seatbelt requirements in Pennsylvania for both children and adults?

What if I was injured by a driver with no insurance or too little insurance?

What is limited tort?

view all

  • Home
  • Library
  • FAQs
  • Resources
  • Attorney Profile
  • Contact Us
©2012 Steven F. Reilly, PC, All Rights Reserved, Reproduced with Permission Privacy Policy
Attorney web design by Foster Web Marketing, the best attorney website design solution on the Web offering search engine optimization for attorneys, lawyer website design, video for attorneys, and more.
Get SEO Tips from The Attorney Internet Marketing Blog